Skip to main content
Grants up to $8,000/year for media
InclusiveWeb

Comparison

Best web accessibility tools 2026

Eight tools people actually use: overlay widgets, audit platforms and free testing utilities. Prices taken from public price lists as of August 2026.

Updated: 29 October 2026

Summary table

ToolTypeWCAGPriceBest for
InclusiveWebAudit + Autofix + Panel + manual testingWCAG 2.1/2.2 AAPanel from $19/mo, Audit from $32/mo, Autofix from $51/mo (billed yearly)SMBs in the US, UK and EU
AccessiBeOverlay + scanner + manual servicesPartial$490/year (up to 5,000 visits/mo)A fast start with US litigation support
UserWayOverlay + scanner + audits and VPATPartial + AI fix$490/year (up to 100,000 pageviews/mo)High-traffic sites that want a widget
EqualWebOverlay + scanner + manual remediationWCAG 2.1 AA (partial)from $39/mo per directoriesTeams who want remediation outsourced
SiteimprovePlatform (Audit + Monitoring)WCAG 2.1/2.2Enterprise (on request)Large organizations and governments
Deque axeTesting (Dev tool)WCAG 2.1/2.2axe-core free; DevTools Pro paidDevelopers and QA teams
WAVETesting (Free tool)WCAG 2.1FreeQuick check of individual pages
LighthouseTesting (Built-in Chrome)Partial (axe-core subset)FreeDevelopers for quick checks

InclusiveWeb

Audit + Autofix + Panel + manual testing — WCAG 2.1/2.2 AA

Panel from $19/mo, Audit from $32/mo, Autofix from $51/mo (billed yearly)

SMBs in the US, UK and EU

Pros

  • Pick the standard per audit: WCAG 2.1 AA, WCAG 2.2 AA, Section 508 or EN 301 549
  • Autofix: fixes are delivered on top of the page after you review them; source files are not rewritten
  • Free Chrome extension checks any page against WCAG 2.1/2.2, no account needed
  • Manual testing with NVDA, JAWS and VoiceOver, with a VPAT/ACR draft (from $50 per page)
  • 90+ audit rules, scheduled monitoring, 32 panel tools + 8 profiles
  • Priced by pages, not by traffic; 7-day free trial without a card

Cons

  • Autofix runs as JavaScript on top of the page — for full conformance the source code still has to be fixed
  • Alt-text generation is still in beta

AccessiBe

Overlay + scanner + manual services — Partial

$490/year (up to 5,000 visits/mo)

A fast start with US litigation support

Pros

  • One-tag install, interface in 33+ languages
  • accessScan free, accessFlow for developers
  • Litigation support on Growth plans and above

Cons

  • Overlay does not fix HTML
  • $1M under an FTC order, April 2025
  • NFB resolution 2021-17
  • Price scales with traffic, not with site size

UserWay

Overlay + scanner + audits and VPAT — Partial + AI fix

$490/year (up to 100,000 pageviews/mo)

High-traffic sites that want a widget

Pros

  • AI remediation included in every paid plan
  • Scanner, monitoring, manual audits, VPAT
  • Widget in 53 languages
  • One of the largest installed bases

Cons

  • The free plan is gone
  • Overlay approach for basic plan
  • Monitoring is billed separately

EqualWeb

Overlay + scanner + manual remediation — WCAG 2.1 AA (partial)

from $39/mo per directories

Teams who want remediation outsourced

Pros

  • Hybrid approach (overlay + code fix)
  • Widget in 32 languages, 27 functions per the company
  • Enterprise support

Cons

  • No full public price list
  • Manual work billed separately
  • Overlay component remains

Siteimprove

Platform (Audit + Monitoring) — WCAG 2.1/2.2

Enterprise (on request)

Large organizations and governments

Pros

  • Full site quality platform
  • Real-time monitoring
  • CMS integrations

Cons

  • Enterprise pricing
  • Does not auto-fix
  • Complex interface

Deque axe

Testing (Dev tool) — WCAG 2.1/2.2

axe-core free; DevTools Pro paid

Developers and QA teams

Pros

  • Gold standard for testing
  • axe-core — open source
  • CI/CD integration
  • Minimal false positives

Cons

  • Testing only, does not fix
  • Requires technical knowledge
  • Paid for enterprise

WAVE

Testing (Free tool) — WCAG 2.1

Free

Quick check of individual pages

Pros

  • Completely free
  • Visual error display
  • Browser extension

Cons

  • One page at a time
  • Not all WCAG 2.2 criteria
  • Automation finds only 30-57% of issues

Lighthouse

Testing (Built-in Chrome) — Partial (axe-core subset)

Free

Developers for quick checks

Pros

  • Built into Chrome DevTools
  • Free
  • Accessibility score 0-100

Cons

  • A subset of axe-core rules, not full WCAG
  • Does not cover full WCAG
  • Automated checks only

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between overlay, remediation and testing?

Overlay — JavaScript on top of the page (visual changes, not HTML). Remediation — fixing the code itself, by hand or with tooling. Testing — finding issues without fixing them (axe, WAVE, Lighthouse). Full WCAG conformance needs remediation plus testing.

Are free tools sufficient?

For a first look, yes: WAVE, Lighthouse and free axe will show you the scale of the problem in minutes. For WCAG 2.1/2.2 AA conformance, no. Automated tooling finds only part of the criteria; the rest requires manual testing with people who use assistive technology.

Which tool to choose for a small business?

Start free: run a few key pages through WAVE or Lighthouse to size the problem. Then it forks. If you have a developer, buy an audit — it gives you a list tied to WCAG criteria, and you fix the code. If you do not, look at a supplier who does manual remediation. A widget panel solves a different problem: it lets visitors adapt the page, but it does not fix the code.

Is an accessibility tool required for EAA compliance?

EAA requires EN 301 549 compliance (based on WCAG 2.1 AA). A tool alone does not guarantee full compliance, but automatic remediation covers a significant part of the requirements. Recommended: automated audit + remediation + manual testing.

See Also

InclusiveWeb vs AccessiBeInclusiveWeb vs UserWayInclusiveWeb vs EqualWeb

Comparing tools?

accessiBe alternatives in 2026UserWay alternatives in 2026

Start with an audit

3 pages free. 90+ WCAG 2.1/2.2 rules. Results in 2-3 minutes.

Try for FreeAccessibility Glossary